Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:06

Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Billy Joel attempted suicide twice and fell into coma after affair with friend's wife - KOMO
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Outer Worlds 2 Is Xbox's First $80 Video Game - Kotaku
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How can I promote my Amazon products to get more sales?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Jane Birkin’s original Hermès bag goes on sale - CNN
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
AI Links Early Life Risks to Behavioral Challenges at Age Five - Neuroscience News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why should the law care about what I do behind closed doors?